Wildlife Management Technologies
Surrogate
Propagation
In response to nationally diminishing numbers in the native quail
population, hunters and wildlife enthusiasts have attempted to give
quail a boost by developing ways of introducing pen raised quail
into the wild.
Baby
quail chick
Quail release systems rose in popularity in the 1970’s, as
quail numbers everywhere began a noticeable decline. All were used
with very limited success due to three consistent problems. The released
birds suffered high losses due to predation. Any surviving birds
tended to move away from the release area, and were unable to be
recovered. Finally, any birds that did remain displayed extremely
poor flight performance.
Through the years there have been countless
remakes and “refinements” of
these methods. While there have been occasional circumstances that
proved better than others, the success rate has averaged between
0-3%. There have been some reports of success as high as 9%.
In 1979,
while working with a hunt club, we began using release systems in
an effort to help our clients have a larger huntable population of
quail on their properties. Between 1979 and 1990, we released nearly
one million quail throughout Texas, Oklahoma and Kansas, with virtually
zero success. In the early 90’s,
we wondered if perhaps there was something we were overlooking in
the release method. Were pen-raised quail themselves flawed or was
it the release method that was still not perfected?

Quail chicks in unit
We noted that
in all three systems quail were raised in a facility, until they
were nine weeks of age or older, transported from where they were
raised then released in an altogether different location.
We started
at what we believed to be the very beginning. What was the difference
between native and pen raised birds? We began a series of experiments
comparing day-old pen raised quail to day-old native quail.
By using
day-old quail, we were experimenting with birds that had not been
influenced by captivity. Native quail eggs were placed in an incubator
and hatched out. They were then taken in total isolation to a prepared
one-acre pen. From behind a screen, the native day-old chicks were
released into the grass. For thirty minutes, their behavior was as
expected: pecking and feeding on insects. After thirty minutes, we
leapt from behind the screen, whistling and disrupting them in order
to record their reaction. Not surprisingly, the day-old native birds
reacted to the stimuli by scattering and hiding motionless in the
grass. After about 1 ½ minutes they began their “lost
chick” call and slowly
emerged from hiding to resume their former activities of feeding
and pecking. After considerable repetition, we concluded that, in
every case, native day-old chicks responded to stimuli by hiding
and becoming motionless. This was a favorable trait bred over hundreds
of years to increase their chances of survival from predation.

Surrogator™ with 3 day old Pheasant Chicks
The
next test group consisted of eggs obtained from a respected game
bird breeder. Twenty-five eggs were placed in an incubator and hatched
out. Upon hatching and drying they were removed, in total isolation,
from the incubator. They were taken to a separate one-acre pen and
released from behind a screen. We observed their behavior for thirty
minutes. The pen-raised offspring displayed behavior that was identical
to the native birds. After thirty minutes, we leapt from behind a
screen, whistling and behaving disruptively in order to record their
reaction. To our surprise, their behavior was identical to that of
their native cousins.
Frankly, we were surprised by this reaction
from the pen-raised offspring. There had been no discernable difference
between the native offspring and the pen-raised offspring. Both knew
instinctively how to survive by hiding and remaining motionless and
quiet until danger passed. It was obvious that a few generations
raised in a pen could not dilute hundreds of generations of native
behavior. It was also obvious that both test groups possessed survival
instincts at one day of age. What was happening between one day of
age and sixteen weeks of age to cause birds to lose their survival
instincts?
Chicks in unit by feed trough
For sixteen weeks each group was tested weekly for their
reaction to stimuli. Conditions for both test groups were identical.
Both were isolated in a facility with little to no human contact.
At the fourth week we noticed some changes in both test groups. A
few birds in each test group began to respond more slowly to the
stimuli. There was a continual deterioration of reaction to stimuli,
each subsequent week until the birds reached nine weeks of age, at
which time 70-75% of them no longer reacted to the stimuli.
When their
athleticism was measured, the native birds proved to be more athletic.
When pressed harder in the later stages of the experiment, their
flight maneuverability was greater than the pen raised stock. We
could only speculate that this is due to the natural selection process
that occurs in the native population.
We further concluded that quail
raised in a pen develop both behavioral and physical problems that
reduce their survivability in the wild. The behavioral problems developed
as a result of atrophying of survival instincts. All quail, even
offspring of pen-raised birds, are born with survival instincts.
The “taming” of
these birds when kept in captivity past the age of about five weeks
dramatically affects their survivability in the wild.
The physical
problems pen-raised quail develop also affect a quail’s survivability.
Birds raised in a pen have lower physical activity than native birds,
as well as easy access to plentiful food. This leads to, what we
refer to as, the “feed-lot” syndrome.
These birds are too heavy and too physically out of shape to elude
danger, even if they were so inclined. They also retain moisture
in their feathers at a greater volume than their native counterparts.
This makes them more susceptible to chilling, leading to higher mortality
than native quail.
Further research revealed evidence that quail possess
a homing instinct. In one study, quail fitted with telemetry equipment
have been tracked traveling forty miles only to return to within
a few yards of the trapping location. We spent some time with some
experts who had successfully established ducks and geese on new bodies
of water, using the homing instinct. By clipping the wings of the
parent ducks or geese, the experts were able to ensure their nesting
location. The birds followed their normal migratory patterns and
flew south, but when they returned north, both parents and offspring
returned to their respective birthplaces. In this manner, new flocks
were established on specific bodies of water. This provided us with
critical information about raising birds from one day of age on a
specific location and was a vital step to our success.
Surrogator™ placed in CRP field
Armed with
this new information, we developed a patented system called Surrogate
Propagation™. To combat leaving an area, we instilled a home
range in quail by raising them on location and imprinting them to
a piece of property. We took day old quail, placed them in a piece
of equipment that provided food, water, warmth and protection for
the first five weeks of life, the time in life when they are most
vulnerable.
To reduce their susceptibility to predators we released
the birds at five weeks of age while they still possessed survival
instincts. We released them during the summer months when cover was
good, insects were plentiful and predation on quail was minimal.
It
appeared that the physical problems fixed themselves, by releasing
the birds at five weeks of age. The “Surrogated” quail
were not turning their food into fat stores, but instead using it
to grow. Their body weight, when compared to pen raised birds from
the same hatch, was less. By the age of ten weeks,
birds released from The Surrogator™ also showed a greater ability
to repel water than their pen raised siblings.
Forty-five tests were
conducted in Oklahoma and Texas. Of these, 43 were successful and
two were not. Both failures, one in Catoosa, OK and one in
San Angelo, TX, occurred when five-week-old birds were released later
than recommended, in the middle of November. A cold front passed
through, dropping temperatures down in the 30’s and bringing
three days of rain. Five-week-old birds are not mature enough to
weather such harsh condition.
In 2006, our clients released
around 300,000 quail in over 30 states from The Surrogator™ units.
A random survey conducted a few years ago indicated an average of
65% survival. The highest was over 90%.

Surrogator™ placed next to Magnet Mix Food Plot site in CRP
Unexpectedly, we soon learned
of a tremendously exciting by-product of the use of the Surrogate
Propagation system. Clients were experiencing successful reproduction
of birds released from The Surrogator™. An example of this occurred
on a 17,000-acre ranch in Catoosa, Oklahoma, known to have very few
quail. Forty-four banded birds were released from a Surrogator unit
in June. We used Tennessee Reds, a bird with unique markings and
coloration, in an effort to determine any successful reproduction.
Upon our return to the area, January 28th, 19 months later, we located
seven coveys of quail in 2 ½ hours and recovered thirty-six.
Of the 36 recovered, each one had the Tennessee Red markings and
all were unbanded, proving that these were in fact offspring of the
birds released from The Surrogator™ unit.
In 2003, we started implementing
this successful system with ringneck pheasants. Like
quail, pheasants are experiencing severe declines over much of their
home range. After
several years the results have shown that the surrogate propagation
system has proven to work equally as well with pheasants.
In addition to bobwhite quail and pheasants, the Surrogate Propagation
system has proven to be tremendously successful with blue (scaled)
quail and chukar. Future experiments with grouse and partridge
are planned. For more information, visit www.quailrestoration.com or www.pheasantrestoration.com,
or call 316-200-0134.

5 week old quail flying from surrogator™
|